Stephen King Hated Kill Bill
This seems pretty out of character for King – I don’t remember him ever being openly critical of somebody elses work like this. But, he clearly didn’t care for Kill Bill. King actually sent a letter to Entertainment Weekly magazine ripping Tarantino’s latest.
You probably saw some good reviews of (‘Kill Bill’), possibly even in (Entertainment Weekly). Don’t you believe it.
You should remember that movie critics see movies free. Also, they don’t have to pay the baby sitter or spring 10 bucks for the parking.
They’re thus apt to rhapsodize over narcissistic stuff like ‘Kill Bill,’ which announces itself as Quentin Tarantino’s Fourth Film, ain’t we la-di-da.
Ain’t we la-di-da? This coming from a man who’s name is featured more prominately on the cover of his books, than the actual title of the book. And he’s got the nerve to try and portray Tarantino as self-absorbed. Please.

Not to mention this book cover, for which he wrote the introduction for his own book titled: “The Importance Of Being Bachman”. Bachman was King’s pseudonym early in his career.
| Print article | This entry was posted by schlyer on February 14, 2004 at 12:41 pm, and is filed under Kill Bill. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed. |
Comments are closed.




about 7 years ago
Fav King movies?
The Shining is really great…
about 7 years ago
Wow. ET asks King to write a column for them, giving his opinion about various pop culture trends, ect., and then some of you fans fly off the handle just because his opinion differs from your own? He shouldn’t be allowed to express his opinion? I’m a big QT fan, but King has accomplished MUCH more than QT has. King has been putting out bestsellers for over 30 years, and has been awarded one of the highest honors a writer can recieve. Granted QT will accomplish a lot more in his lifetime, right now he is not on par with King.
Movie’s based on King’s work suck? Are you even familar with The Shawshank Redemption? Stand By Me? Misery? The Green Mile? The Dead Zone? Carrie? Creepshow? The Shining? His films have been nominated for at least 15 oscars, including a couple ‘best pictures’ (and the Shining, which DID suck compared to the book, which was about alcoholism and child abuse more than ghosts, got no nominations).
about 7 years ago
Wow. ET asks King to write a column for them, giving his opinion about various pop culture trends, ect., and then some of you fans fly off the handle just because his opinion differs from your own? He shouldn’t be allowed to express his opinion? I’m a big QT fan, but King has accomplished MUCH more than QT has. King has been putting out bestsellers for over 30 years, and has been awarded one of the highest honors a writer can recieve. Granted QT will accomplish a lot more in his lifetime, right now he is not on par with King.
Movie’s based on King’s work suck? Are you even familar with The Shawshank Redemption? Stand By Me? Misery? The Green Mile? The Dead Zone? Carrie? Creepshow? The Shining? His films have been nominated for at least 15 oscars, including a couple ‘best pictures’ (and the Shining, which DID suck compared to the book, which was about alcoholism and child abuse more than ghosts, got no nominations).
about 7 years ago
Well, I suppose I’ll throw my two cents in here. I will agree with nelson in the fact that King’s distaste for Kill Bill is his opinion. We can’t say it’s wrong or right. That’s the very basis of an opinion. However, disagreed with King’s reasoning for his disliking of Kill Bill. I believe that his comment was very hypocritical. He claimed that Kill Bill was “narcissistic” for it being marketed as “Quentin Tarantino’s 4th Film”, even though, as schlyer pointed out with the book covers, his novels are clearly marketed as author-based. It isn’t being narcissistic, it just sells having a reputable creator’s name plastered on the promotional media. Furthermore, I would encourage that authors and filmmakers place their names on their work. Most of these writers/directors work hard for their creation. It doesn’t bother me that they give themselves credit for this.
I was a bit disappointed as well to see that King focused on the promotional media relating to the film in his criticism rather than the actual film itself. I can say that I enjoyed Kill Bill (and Tarantino’s works overall) not only because of the story, but because it was risky, original filmmaking. Sure, the style of the movie was sampled from various genres of film, but it created something new, daring, and separated itself from the rest of today’s pack. Some of King’s best works in fact were risky and original in that he strayed from his staple horror stories to create in-depth dramas (stories such as those that were the basis for movies like The Shawshank Redemption, Stand By Me and The Green Mile). So in a nutshell, I was disappointed by King’s reasoning.
Now about the whole Patrick Stewart incident. After reading the transcript a few times, it has occured to me that Stewart pulled Kill Bill out of his ass and for some reason or another decided to throw it in his statement. I understand Amnesty International’s message and fully support it. However, Stewart’s attack on Kill Bill was irrelevent to his statement and just plain ignorant. Anyone who has seen the film knows that it absolutely does not portray any sort of domestic abuse towards women in a glorifying manner. It is a vengence story, plain and simple. The very fact that Stewart stated that Kill Bill was an abomination because it contained women against women violence is not only ignorant, it is somewhat sexist in the fact that Stewart made his remark only focusing on the character’s sexes, rather than the reason for this violence (hunting down the people who took part in the attempted murder of not only the bride herself, but her husband (or husband to be) and her unborn child (as if that wasn’t a good enough motive)). To sum it up, his comments were ignorant and unjust. And there we have my two cents.
about 7 years ago
P.S. Sorry about the link, for some reason when I posted, I believe some form of spyware attached that URL to it.
about 7 years ago
Come on, you kidding? You don’t see a difference between putting an author’s name on the book cover(which is also NOT King’s doing–the publisher does that) to a movie writer/director saying “The 4th Film” by himself?
Pretentious, is what it is.
Tarantino will never come close to accomplishing what King does. At the rate he’s going, he’ll direct a total of 7 movies(he claims he won’t direct once he’s in his fifties).
So put away the bile until you have something to back it up with.
about 7 years ago
i just want to go ahead and say, that i personally believe that Kill Bill is one of the worst movies to ever hit the screen.
it is awful, i am shocked to see anyone have any sort of sentiment for this movie. the fact that the movie is being accepted on such a wide scale and actually getting good reviews by the majority is not only baffeling to me, but also laughable.
Steven King movie’s, like them or not are a staple. Ask someone on the street to name a Steven King movie. Ask them to name a Tarentino film besides Kill Bill. And if kill bill wasn’t getting all this ridiculuous press then the majority wouldn’t even know who the hell tarantino even is
about 7 years ago
Holy shit people calm down. Let the man have his own opinion of something. Im sure there are some movies you don’t like, its not like people hate you for that. Get a life.
about 7 years ago
Hey, Graham Greene didn’t like THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN.
about 7 years ago
To quote the article: “Not to mention this book cover, for which he wrote the introduction for his own book titled: “The Importance Of Being Bachman”. Bachman was King’s pseudonym early in his career.”
Yeah, he wrote an introduction to his own book. Whoop-de-crap. You know how many authors write introductions to their own books? He titled it “The Importance of Being Bachman” as a pun on Oscar Wilde’s “The Importance of Being Earnest.” Yes, Bachman was his pseudonym…that’s why the book was called “The Bachman Books,” because he wrote them under a different name. I just don’t know what point this article’s author was trying to make with this statement…King wasn’t actually saying he thought “being Bachman” was important; it was a pun on a famous title.
about 7 years ago
I just saw Kill Bill 2, and it sucked almost as bad as “volume” 1. Pulp fiction excepted, QT seems good at ripping off other people’s movies, nothing more. When you guys grow up a little maybe you’ll be ready for some Beat Takashi.
about 7 years ago
I just saw Kill Bill 2, and it sucked almost as bad as “volume” 1. Pulp fiction excepted, QT seems good at ripping off other people’s movies, nothing more. When you guys grow up a little maybe you’ll be ready for some Beat Takashi.